Wind turbines can be dangerous for human health – and the
industry has known it for more than 25 years.
A newly rediscovered report, prepared in 1987 for the US
Department of Energy, showed that inaudible infrasound produced by the
generators can cause problems for local residents, which become worse over
time.
People living near wind farms have complained of problems
such as nausea, headaches and insomnia – so-called Wind Turbine Syndrome.
The 1987 evidence contradicts the claims of advocates for
the wind industry that symptoms are all in the mind.
Until recently, trade body Renewable UK claimed: ‘In over
25 years, no member of the public has been harmed by the normal operation of
wind farms.’
It further stated that claims wind farms emit ‘infrasound
and cause associated health problems’ were ‘unscientific’.
But the 1987 report, led by N.D. Kelley from the Solar
Energy Research Institute in Colorado, found ‘impulsive infrasound’ caused
health problems and recommended noise curbs on turbines.
However the industry code of practice specifically
excludes infrasonic frequencies. The report lends weight to claims of
campaigners such as Australia’s Dr Sarah Laurie, who claims a concerted
industry cover-up.
But Renewable UK said: ‘We don’t accept there are health
impacts caused by wind turbine noise. [The 1987 report] was based on antiquated
machines. Turbine design has become more sophisticated.’
Official Government figures on the size of the green
economy are totally bogus, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.
The figures, issued by the Department for Business and
Skills, are said to show that the environmental sector was worth a staggering
£122 billion last year, making it the fastest-growing part of the economy,
writes David Rose.
Ministers have repeatedly used the figures to justify
crippling energy taxes and subsidies for wind farms. They claim the figures
show that these policies will open the way to a booming future of ‘green jobs’
and low-carbon prosperity.
But documents obtained under the Freedom of Information
Act reveal the true value of the green economy is actually between only
£16.8 billion and £27.9 billion, depending on exactly how the term ‘green
economy’ is defined. In other words, the official figures exaggerate the scale
of the sector by up to 700 per cent.
The so-called Low Carbon and Environmental Goods and
Services (LCEGS) figure has no known basis in reality.
For example, calculations assert that renewable energy is
worth £37 billion a year – when, according to the Department of Energy, the
entire UK electricity market is worth less than £30 billion.
Even the Renewable Energy Association – an industry lobby
group which tries to persuade the Government to increase its subsidies – says
that the total value of the renewable sector is less than £10 billion.
The LCEGS figures also include billions of pounds from
activities which few people would class as ‘green’ – such as water supply,
landfill sites for rubbish and, most bizarrely of all – accounting for almost
£9 billion – ordinary windows and doors.
Another £11.7 billion is supposedly contributed by the
liquid propane and natural gas markets. This figure is many times greater than
the industry’s own estimates – while gas is a CO2-producing fossil fuel.
Analysis of the LCEGS data came in a six-month report by
independent researcher Ben Pile, commissioned by UKIP MEP Roger Helmer.
The politician said there should be a full review of all
policies influenced by the data. ‘The previous and current governments made big
promises about the “green economy”, based on research that was hidden from
public view and which now seems to have been skewed to favour the green
agenda,’ he said. ‘They have misled people, including MPs.’
This newspaper gave a copy of the report to the Business
Department, asking if it contained anything that could be factually disputed.
A spokeswoman replied that the green economy ‘is a
complex area to assess as there is no standard industry classification.
However, the LCEGS data has helped to inform the debate’.
Business Secretary Vince Cable has cited the bogus
figures to back his case for a new Green Investment Bank, claiming they prove
that ‘green sectors have outperformed the wider economy’.
No comments:
Post a Comment